LEGATECH

An EPC (Engineering, Procurement, and Construction) contractor working in an Iranian Special Economic Zone (SEZ) faced a legal problem over paying Value Added Tax (VAT) on goods and services needed to complete their project.

In complex construction and engineering contracts, the assignment of obligations can lead to significant questions about arbitration jurisdiction. Recently, LegaTech represented the claimant in a dispute where a contract was assigned from one party (the assignor) to its affiliated company (the assignee).

In high-stakes construction projects, disputes over delays and disruptions can drastically affect budgets, timelines, and reputations. LegaTech recently led our client—a contractor for two major petrochemical plants in Assaluyeh, Iran—to a groundbreaking €34 million award and 41 months of excusable delay.

In large EPC construction projects, determining the proper dispute resolution forum is crucial. When contracts contain ambiguous clauses or responsibilities are transferred among parties, it can lead to serious jurisdictional challenges.

n large-scale EPC projects, especially those involving multiple contractors and phases, untangling delay responsibilities can be challenging. Legatech recently tackled a complex construction dispute in the Middle East, where our client a construction contractor handled Section

At LegaTech, we are currently assisting a contractor in a dispute with a petrochemical company (the Employer) regarding the release of good performance retention funds. The project, which involved building a polymer plant, was stopped before completion when the Employer decided not to renew the contract

In large construction projects, particularly in industries like petrochemicals, challenges are inevitable. But one issue that may arises is the extent to which the project owner can interfere with the contractor’s work process. A case currently being handled by LegaTech puts this very question to the test.

In a recent EPC dispute between a contractor and a petrochemical company, LegaTech successfully helped the contractor secure compensation after a significant cost increase caused by a change in the vendor list.

When it comes to large construction projects, clarity in contracts isn’t just important—it’s critical. But even the most well-drafted agreements can leave room for interpretation. That’s exactly what happened in a recent arbitration case LegaTech handled.

Legatech recently managed a complex construction dispute related to a refinery project in the Middle East, involving Section C of an EPC contract. In this case, our client, a construction contractor, was responsible only for the Construction phase (Section C), while the Engineering and Procurement (E&P) parts of the project …

In this arbitration case, we had the privilege of representing the claimant in a dispute that emerged from the assignment of a contract by one party (the assignor) to its affiliated company (the assignee). The claimant filed a claim naming both the assignor and the assignee as respondents…

In the challenging world of construction, disputes over delays and disruptions can significantly impact projects. At LegaTech, we understand the intricate interplay of contracts, engineering realities, and legal requirements involved in such disputes. By collaborating closely with our technical team, we effectively execute our projects and deliver exceptional results…

LegaTech recently represented a client in a challenging arbitration case involving an EPC contractor in a major construction project. The primary dispute arose when the project owner transferred its responsibilities and obligations to an employer closely associated with the owner. Although this transfer was intended …